Skip to main content
Journals

A Real-World Study of Patient and Physician Satisfaction With Repeated AbobotulinumtoxinA Treatment of Glabellar Lines in Chinese Patients

Aesthetic Surgery Journal Open Forum
Aesthetic Surgery Journal Open Forum

Authors: Jianmei Huang, BMed , Chungyung Keung, MMed , Li Ma, MMed , Jingjing Zhao, BMed , Zhiqiang Xue, PhD , Shuxian Zhang, BMed , Yuan Chen, BMed , Lin Tao, MMed , Qingyang Liu, PhD , Cecilia Persson, PhD, Inna Prygova, MD , Weimin Song, MMed

Abstract:  AbobotulinumtoxinA (aboBoNT-A; Dysport®) is approved in China for treating glabellar lines (GLs) with fast onset of action (median: 2 days) and effectiveness up to 6 months (Chinese pivotal trial data), but real-world data remain limited. This study’s primary objective is to assess patient satisfaction following 3 cycles of aboBoNT-A treatment for moderate-to-severe GLs in a real-world setting. Secondary variables included effectiveness, patient and physician satisfaction in each cycle, and injection practice details. In this non-interventional, multicenter study conducted in China, participants received 3 injection cycles of aboBoNT-A in the GL area, 3 to 6 months apart, with follow-up at Week 3, before the next treatment, and at end-of-study. Assessments included satisfaction questionnaires, GL wrinkle severity, and safety. At 3 weeks after the third injection, 100% of patients (N = 204) were satisfied with treatment (very satisfied: 71.1%; satisfied: 28.9%, primary endpoint), and physicians were very satisfied/satisfied with overall treatment outcome in 99.5% of patients. Physicians reported ≥1-grade improvement in GL severity at maximum frown in ≥90% of patients at 3 weeks in each cycle and in ≥64% at ∼5 months post-treatment (at next treatment). For ≥99% of patients, physicians would recommend aboBoNT-A to colleagues. The treatment was well tolerated, with no new safety findings. All patients were satisfied with aboBoNT-A GL treatment after 3 injection cycles in this Chinese real-world study. As supported by multiple outcome measures, both patients and physicians reported high satisfaction with treatment and long-lasting improvement in wrinkle severity across single or repeat cycles. Treatment was well tolerated.

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Related Articles

Upper facial lines (UFLs), including glabellar frown lines (GFLs), horizontal forehead lines (HFLs), and lateral canthal lines (LCLs) are prevalent aesthetic concerns addressed with botulinum neurotoxin type A (BoNT-A). IncobotulinumtoxinA, a highly purified BoNT-A formulation, is utilized for simultaneous UFLs treatment; yet, comprehensive synthesized evidence is limited.
Poly-L-lactic acid (PLLA) is a biostimulatory injectable that restores midfacial volume through collagen neogenesis rather than gel-based filling. Controlled clinical evidence directly quantifying PLLA's volumetric efficacy remains limited. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and patient-reported outcomes of a Norberg Medical PLLA formulation for midface rejuvenation in a prospective, evaluator-blinded, split-face controlled study.
Conventional botulinum toxin type A (BoNT/A) products include non-therapeutic accessory proteins vary in composition and manufacturing processes, which may contribute to differences in purity and biochemical characteristics. YY001 (Retoxin®) is a novel recombinant BoNT/A manufactured via E. coli expression to reduce impurities, improve purity, and minimize immunogenic risk.
Collagenase clostridium histolyticum-aaes (CCH-aaes) is FDA-approved for cellulite treatment but was withdrawn because of high bruising incidence. Histological effects of CCH-aaes in humans remain poorly characterized. The aim of the study was to evaluate histopathologic changes in human subcutaneous tissue following CCH-aaes injection and compare injection techniques to identify strategies that reduce bruising.
Energy-based devices are widely used for facial rejuvenation; as a result, an increasing proportion of patients presenting for facelift or necklift surgery have a history of prior treatment with ultrasound- or radiofrequency-based technologies. While the efficacy and safety of these devices are well established, their cumulative effects on facial soft tissues critical to deep-layer facelift surgery remain under-recognized.