Skip to main content
Journals

The Efficacy and Safety of Radiofrequency Microneedling for Melasma: A Systematic Review and Qualitative Evidence Synthesis

Aesthetic Surgery Journal Open Forum
Aesthetic Surgery Journal Open Forum

Authors: Narendra Kumar, PhD , Shangli Lin, MD , Amit Luthra, DNB , Tejas Patel, MD , Ashish C Bhatia, MD

Abstract:  Melasma is a chronic, relapsing hyperpigmentation disorder that is difficult to treat, particularly in Fitzpatrick skin types III-V, where energy-based devices frequently induce postinflammatory hyperpigmentation (PIH). Radiofrequency microneedling (RFMN) has emerged as a promising alternative because it targets dermal pathology while minimizing epidermal injury. Systematically evaluate the efficacy, safety, and mechanistic rationale of RFMN for melasma. A PRISMA 2020 compliant search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, and LILACS (2014-2025) identified clinical studies evaluating RFMN alone or in combination therapies. Risk of bias was assessed using Joanna Briggs Institute tools. Owing to clinical and methodological heterogeneity, a qualitative synthesis was performed. Across 12 included studies, RFMN consistently improved Melasma Area and Severity Index (MASI) or modified MASI scores and melanin indices, with effects maintained up to 6 months. Histological evidence demonstrated reductions in dermal senescence markers and partial restoration of basement-membrane integrity. RFMN also showed a favorable safety profile, with a low incidence of PIH in darker phototypes. Combination treatment, particularly with low-fluence Q-switched Nd:YAG laser produced greater pigment reduction than monotherapy. RFMN is an effective and safe modality for melasma, offering advantages over pigment-directed lasers by addressing dermal mechanisms and limiting PIH risk. It may serve as a first-line energy-based therapy.

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Related Articles

Upper facial lines (UFLs), including glabellar frown lines (GFLs), horizontal forehead lines (HFLs), and lateral canthal lines (LCLs) are prevalent aesthetic concerns addressed with botulinum neurotoxin type A (BoNT-A). IncobotulinumtoxinA, a highly purified BoNT-A formulation, is utilized for simultaneous UFLs treatment; yet, comprehensive synthesized evidence is limited.
Hyaluronidase is often described as “dissolving” dermal filler, but this term oversimplifies how the enzyme actually interacts with long-standing filler within living tissue. This article explains why hyaluronidase more accurately modifies a complex filler–tissue system rather than completely eliminating filler, and why clearer terminology improves patient understanding, clinical decision-making, and ethical practice in aesthetic medicine.
Botulinum neurotoxin A (BoNT-A) is widely used clinically; yet, its temporary effects require repeated injections that increase cost and inconvenience. There is limited rigorous evidence to support claims that repeated BoNT-A use alters efficacy. Unlike peripheral nerve transection, which causes irreversible denervation after 12 to 24 months, the long-term physiological effects of BoNT-A chemodenervation remain unclear.