Skip to main content
Journals

Therapeutic Efficacy and Safety of Recombinant Botulinum Toxin Type A for Moderate to Severe Glabellar Lines: A Randomized, Controlled, Double-blind, Phase III Trial in Chinese Adults

Aesthetic Surgery Journal
Aesthetic Surgery Journal

Authors:  Yan Wu, MD , Xiao Long, MD , Nanze Yu, MD , Jin Chen, MD , Jianyun Lu, MD , Lina Tan, MD , Wei Lai, MD , Li Li, MD , Sufan Wu, MD , Liming Wu, MD, Jiaming Sun, MD , Hongsen Bi, MD , Songmei Geng, MD , Huiping Wang, MD , Shengkang Luo, MD , Zhiqi Hu, MD , Jianmin Yang, MD , Baoxi Wang, MD , Wu Yang, PhD , Xiaoli Sun, MS , Xiaoyun Sun, MD, PhD
Abstract: Conventional botulinum toxin type A (BoNT/A) products include non-therapeutic accessory proteins vary in composition and manufacturing processes, which may contribute to differences in purity and biochemical characteristics. YY001 (Retoxin®) is a novel recombinant BoNT/A manufactured via E. coli expression to reduce impurities, improve purity, and minimize immunogenic risk. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of YY001, a recombinant botulinum toxin type A (Chongqing Claruvis Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Chongqing, China), in the treatment of moderate-to-severe glabellar lines. In this multicenter, randomized, double-blind, vehicle- and active-controlled Phase III trial, 529 adults aged 18-65 with moderate to severe glabellar lines were randomized 4:2:1 to receive a single 20 U injection of YY001, Botox®(Allergan Pharmaceuticals Ireland, Westport, Ireland), or vehicle. The primary endpoint was composite response rate (CRR) at Week 4, defined as a ≥2-grade improvement of glabellar line severity assessed by both investigator and participant. Secondary endpoints included onset time, duration, satisfaction, and safety. YY001 achieved a CRR of 86.7% at Week 4, significantly outperforming Botox® (66.7%, P < .0001) and vehicle (1.3%, P < .0001). It showed faster onset, longer median duration (97 days), and high participant satisfaction. Adverse events were mild and comparable across groups. Only one case of anti-drug antibody was observed; no neutralizing antibodies were detected. A 12-week follow-up and ethnically homogenous population may limit generalizability. YY001 demonstrated strong efficacy and a favorable safety profile than Botox®. Longer-term and multicenter studies are needed to assess durability, immunogenicity, and applicability across broader populations.

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Related Articles

Hyaluronic acid (HA) is widely used for lip augmentation; however, the safety and performance of injection techniques and instruments (needle vs cannula) remain unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety of HA injection techniques for lip augmentation and to assess patient satisfaction, injected volume, and associations with technique, instrument, and HA product.
Resident-run clinics (RRCs) have become an important component of plastic surgery training. This study evaluates outcomes from a longitudinal RRC focused on neuromodulator and soft tissue filler injections over a 5-year period. The aim of this study was to assess clinical outcomes, patient retention, resident experience by postgraduate year (PGY) level, and the safety of RRCs as a training model.
Melasma is a chronic, relapsing hyperpigmentation disorder that is difficult to treat, particularly in Fitzpatrick skin types III-V, where energy-based devices frequently induce postinflammatory hyperpigmentation (PIH). Radiofrequency microneedling (RFMN) has emerged as a promising alternative because it targets dermal pathology while minimizing epidermal injury.
Hyaluronidase is often described as “dissolving” dermal filler, but this term oversimplifies how the enzyme actually interacts with long-standing filler within living tissue. This article explains why hyaluronidase more accurately modifies a complex filler–tissue system rather than completely eliminating filler, and why clearer terminology improves patient understanding, clinical decision-making, and ethical practice in aesthetic medicine.
Botulinum neurotoxin A (BoNT-A) is widely used clinically; yet, its temporary effects require repeated injections that increase cost and inconvenience. There is limited rigorous evidence to support claims that repeated BoNT-A use alters efficacy. Unlike peripheral nerve transection, which causes irreversible denervation after 12 to 24 months, the long-term physiological effects of BoNT-A chemodenervation remain unclear.