Skip to main content
Journals

Efficacy and Safety of Poly-L-lactic Acid for Midface Rejuvenation: A 12-Month Split-face Controlled Evaluation With 3D Imaging and Patient-reported Outcomes

Aesthetic Surgery Journal
Aesthetic Surgery Journal

Authors: Martina Ponzo, MD , Mariagiovanna Lombardi, MD , Stefano Avvedimento, MD , Federico M D'Alessio, MD , Maurizio Cavallini, MD , Adriano Santorelli, MD

Abstract: Poly-L-lactic acid (PLLA) is a biostimulatory injectable that restores midfacial volume through collagen neogenesis rather than gel-based filling. Controlled clinical evidence directly quantifying PLLA's volumetric efficacy remains limited. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and patient-reported outcomes of a Norberg Medical PLLA formulation for midface rejuvenation in a prospective, evaluator-blinded, split-face controlled study. Participants were enrolled between July 2024 and September 2024, with follow-up completed in September 2025. Ninety-five patients underwent three standardized PLLA sessions on one hemiface and saline placebo on the contralateral side. Each vial contained 150 mg PLLA in spherical microparticles, reconstituted with 5 mL sterile water without lidocaine. Assessments included Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS), Vectra H1 3D volumetry (malar, zygomatic, mandibular), FACE-Q, and Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS). Two blinded evaluators rated WSRS. Statistical analysis included paired testing, responder rates (≥1-grade WSRS improvement), and inter-rater reliability (ICC). At 12 months, PLLA-treated sides showed significant WSRS reduction vs baseline and saline control (Δ = −0.68, P < .001). 3D analysis confirmed sustained volumetric enhancement across all midface subunits. Inter-rater reliability was excellent (ICC = 0.91), and 82.1% achieved ≥1-grade WSRS improvement. Patient satisfaction remained high, mirroring objective findings. Adverse events were mild and transient, with no granulomas, nodules, or vascular events recorded. Controlled split-face evaluation demonstrated that standardized PLLA treatment yields measurable, long-lasting midfacial volume restoration with excellent safety and high patient satisfaction. No granulomas or delayed-onset nodules were observed in this 12-month, 95-patient cohort, supporting a favorable safety profile for this PLLA formulation under these study conditions.

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Related Articles

Hyaluronic acid (HA) is widely used for lip augmentation; however, the safety and performance of injection techniques and instruments (needle vs cannula) remain unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety of HA injection techniques for lip augmentation and to assess patient satisfaction, injected volume, and associations with technique, instrument, and HA product.
Upper facial lines (UFLs), including glabellar frown lines (GFLs), horizontal forehead lines (HFLs), and lateral canthal lines (LCLs) are prevalent aesthetic concerns addressed with botulinum neurotoxin type A (BoNT-A). IncobotulinumtoxinA, a highly purified BoNT-A formulation, is utilized for simultaneous UFLs treatment; yet, comprehensive synthesized evidence is limited.
Hyaluronidase is often described as “dissolving” dermal filler, but this term oversimplifies how the enzyme actually interacts with long-standing filler within living tissue. This article explains why hyaluronidase more accurately modifies a complex filler–tissue system rather than completely eliminating filler, and why clearer terminology improves patient understanding, clinical decision-making, and ethical practice in aesthetic medicine.
Botulinum neurotoxin A (BoNT-A) is widely used clinically; yet, its temporary effects require repeated injections that increase cost and inconvenience. There is limited rigorous evidence to support claims that repeated BoNT-A use alters efficacy. Unlike peripheral nerve transection, which causes irreversible denervation after 12 to 24 months, the long-term physiological effects of BoNT-A chemodenervation remain unclear.